Andy Wahrol
(1928-1987)
Andy Warhol was a very successful commercial
illustrator. Earlier artists, like Monet, had painted the same
motif in series in order to display minute discriminations of
perception, the shift of light and color form hour to hour on
a haystack, and how these could be recorded by the subtlety of
eye and hand. Warhol's thirty-two soup cans are about nothing
of the kind. They are about sameness (though with different labels):
same brand, same size, same paint surface, same fame as product.
They mimic the condition of mass advertising, out of which his
sensibility had grown.
|
Piet Mondrian
(1872-1944)
In the early 1900s many artists tried
various abstract ways of representing reality. Mondrian went beyond
them.
Everything was spotless white, like a
laboratory. In a light smock, with his clean-shaven face, taciturn,
wearing his heavy glasses, Mondrian seemed more a scientist or
priest than an artist.
|
Magritte
(1898-1967) The
fascinating and challenging images in Magritte's works stem from
revelations of the mystery of the visible world.
Magritte, who was a painter and a painter tout
court, albeit an unusual one, was nevertheless more aware than
any of his contemporaries of words and of the dubious status they
had acquired. His consciousness of words is evident in both his
writings and paintings. |
Constantin Brancusi
(1876-1956)
Brancusi was a Romanian sculptor who
trained initially as a carpenter and stonemason.
While never entirely rejecting the natural world,
Brancusi undoubtedly succeeds in conveying a sense of gravity
by reducing his work to a few basic elements. Paradoxically, this
process also tends to highlight the complexity of thought that
has gone into its making.
Monumental, subtle and intimate, Brancusi’s
sculptures are rightly now considered to be the work of a modern
master.
|
Claude Monet
(1840-1926)
Monet is regarded as the Impresionist
par excellence.
Monet never painted a nude, and one may suspect
that his vast world of nature and the theme of water played in
his art the role that the fantasy about women or children or mothers
played in the imagination of other artists. All his variety, from
the stillness of the lilly pond to the awful turbulence of waves
beating on the rocks, may have to do with the feelings or passions
that in other artists can be recognized in their mythology and
subjects or through a fanciful imagery of human figures.
|